Lithuania vs Switzerland: Input — Cropland potassium
Input — Cropland potassium over time
- Lithuania
- Switzerland
How they compare
Switzerland currently reports 71,248 t against 68,426 t in Lithuania, a difference of 2,822 t.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Lithuania ahead.
Lithuania ranks 78th and Switzerland ranks 75th of 186 countries.
Switzerland has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Lithuania | Switzerland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 101,261 t | 103,826 t | 2,565 t | Switzerland |
| 2000s | 78,566 t | 86,337 t | 7,771 t | Switzerland |
| 2010s | 78,696 t | 79,651 t | 954.07 t | Switzerland |
| 2020s | 73,180 t | 74,742 t | 1,562 t | Switzerland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland potassium, Lithuania or Switzerland?
- Switzerland, at 71,248 t against 68,426 t in Lithuania as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland potassium between Lithuania and Switzerland?
- 2,822 t, with Switzerland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lithuania and Switzerland?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Lithuania and Switzerland rank globally for input — cropland potassium?
- Lithuania ranks 78th and Switzerland ranks 75th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).