Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) vs Spain: Input β€” Cropland potassium

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
3.32 million t
in 2023
Spain
735,400 t
in 2023
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) rank
7th
Spain rank
14th

Input β€” Cropland potassium over time

  • Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
  • Spain
01.0M2.0M3.0M196119922023

How they compare

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) currently reports 3.32 million t against 735,400 t in Spain, a difference of 2.58 million t.

That makes Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)'s figure about 4.5 times Spain's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) has been ahead every year.

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 7th and Spain ranks 14th of 10 groups.

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) Spain Difference Ahead
1960s 907,505 t 403,410 t 504,095 t Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
1970s 1.19 million t 587,301 t 599,773 t Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
1980s 1.36 million t 668,296 t 693,509 t Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
1990s 1.43 million t 805,222 t 626,914 t Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
2000s 1.80 million t 839,844 t 963,616 t Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
2010s 2.67 million t 786,835 t 1.88 million t Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
2020s 3.19 million t 795,112 t 2.40 million t Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher input β€” cropland potassium, Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) or Spain?
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs), at 3.32 million t against 735,400 t in Spain as of 2023.
What is the difference in input β€” cropland potassium between Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) and Spain?
2.58 million t, with Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) and Spain?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) and Spain rank globally for input β€” cropland potassium?
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 7th and Spain ranks 14th of 10 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input β€” Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) vs Spain: Input β€” Cropland potassium. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 18 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/input-cropland-potassium/low-income-food-deficit-countries-lifdcs/spain/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/input-cropland-potassium/low-income-food-deficit-countries-lifdcs/spain/">Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) vs Spain: Input β€” Cropland potassium</a> β€” Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Input β€” Cropland potassium
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
233 places, 13,500 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).