Luxembourg vs Sierra Leone: Input — Cropland potassium
Input — Cropland potassium over time
- Luxembourg
- Sierra Leone
How they compare
Luxembourg currently reports 6,297 t against 5,797 t in Sierra Leone, a difference of 500 t.
That makes Luxembourg's figure about 1.1 times Sierra Leone's.
Across all 24 years both countries report, Luxembourg has been ahead every year.
Luxembourg ranks 148th and Sierra Leone ranks 149th of 201 countries.
Luxembourg has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Luxembourg | Sierra Leone | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 6,665 t | 1,767 t | 4,898 t | Luxembourg |
| 2010s | 6,496 t | 4,380 t | 2,116 t | Luxembourg |
| 2020s | 6,327 t | 5,833 t | 493.98 t | Luxembourg |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland potassium, Luxembourg or Sierra Leone?
- Luxembourg, at 6,297 t against 5,797 t in Sierra Leone as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland potassium between Luxembourg and Sierra Leone?
- 500 t, with Luxembourg ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Luxembourg and Sierra Leone?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Luxembourg and Sierra Leone rank globally for input — cropland potassium?
- Luxembourg ranks 148th and Sierra Leone ranks 149th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).