Madagascar vs Slovakia: Input — Cropland potassium
Input — Cropland potassium over time
- Madagascar
- Slovakia
How they compare
Madagascar currently reports 40,563 t against 37,790 t in Slovakia, a difference of 2,773 t.
That makes Madagascar's figure about 1.1 times Slovakia's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 31 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Slovakia ahead.
Madagascar ranks 92nd and Slovakia ranks 95th of 186 countries.
Slovakia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Madagascar | Slovakia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 35,829 t | 74,679 t | 38,850 t | Slovakia |
| 2000s | 30,184 t | 53,061 t | 22,877 t | Slovakia |
| 2010s | 37,690 t | 43,621 t | 5,931 t | Slovakia |
| 2020s | 39,096 t | 41,724 t | 2,629 t | Slovakia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland potassium, Madagascar or Slovakia?
- Madagascar, at 40,563 t against 37,790 t in Slovakia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland potassium between Madagascar and Slovakia?
- 2,773 t, with Madagascar ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Madagascar and Slovakia?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
- How do Madagascar and Slovakia rank globally for input — cropland potassium?
- Madagascar ranks 92nd and Slovakia ranks 95th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).