Malaysia vs Türkiye: Input — Cropland potassium
Input — Cropland potassium over time
- Malaysia
- Türkiye
How they compare
Malaysia currently reports 1.09 million t against 184,236 t in Türkiye, a difference of 906,984 t.
That makes Malaysia's figure about 5.9 times Türkiye's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Türkiye ahead.
Malaysia ranks 9th and Türkiye ranks 8th of 186 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Malaysia averaged higher in 6 and Türkiye in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malaysia | Türkiye | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 39,561 t | 82,294 t | 42,733 t | Türkiye |
| 1970s | 123,432 t | 92,989 t | 30,443 t | Malaysia |
| 1980s | 282,488 t | 107,422 t | 175,066 t | Malaysia |
| 1990s | 546,910 t | 126,871 t | 420,039 t | Malaysia |
| 2000s | 673,958 t | 133,275 t | 540,683 t | Malaysia |
| 2010s | 949,962 t | 163,501 t | 786,461 t | Malaysia |
| 2020s | 927,960 t | 188,956 t | 739,004 t | Malaysia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland potassium, Malaysia or Türkiye?
- Malaysia, at 1.09 million t against 184,236 t in Türkiye as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland potassium between Malaysia and Türkiye?
- 906,984 t, with Malaysia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malaysia and Türkiye?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Malaysia and Türkiye rank globally for input — cropland potassium?
- Malaysia ranks 9th and Türkiye ranks 8th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).