Mali vs Zambia: Input — Cropland potassium
Input — Cropland potassium over time
- Mali
- Zambia
How they compare
Mali currently reports 56,184 t against 48,904 t in Zambia, a difference of 7,280 t.
That makes Mali's figure about 1.1 times Zambia's.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Mali ahead.
Mali ranks 93rd and Zambia ranks 95th of 201 countries.
Mali has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mali | Zambia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 9,791 t | 4,809 t | 4,981 t | Mali |
| 1970s | 11,167 t | 9,799 t | 1,368 t | Mali |
| 1980s | 15,012 t | 12,001 t | 3,011 t | Mali |
| 1990s | 20,226 t | 14,434 t | 5,793 t | Mali |
| 2000s | 40,327 t | 22,281 t | 18,046 t | Mali |
| 2010s | 52,140 t | 34,588 t | 17,552 t | Mali |
| 2020s | 61,182 t | 54,606 t | 6,576 t | Mali |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland potassium, Mali or Zambia?
- Mali, at 56,184 t against 48,904 t in Zambia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland potassium between Mali and Zambia?
- 7,280 t, with Mali ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mali and Zambia?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Mali and Zambia rank globally for input — cropland potassium?
- Mali ranks 93rd and Zambia ranks 95th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).