Malta vs Polynesia: Input — Cropland potassium
Input — Cropland potassium over time
- Malta
- Polynesia
How they compare
Polynesia currently reports 2,030 t against 1,194 t in Malta, a difference of 836 t.
That makes Polynesia's figure about 1.7 times Malta's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Polynesia ahead.
Malta ranks 170th and Polynesia ranks 167th of 201 countries.
Polynesia has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malta | Polynesia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 849.29 t | 896.45 t | 47.16 t | Polynesia |
| 1970s | 1,228 t | 1,326 t | 97.29 t | Polynesia |
| 1980s | 1,648 t | 2,482 t | 834.56 t | Polynesia |
| 1990s | 1,992 t | 2,609 t | 617.12 t | Polynesia |
| 2000s | 1,901 t | 2,697 t | 795.6 t | Polynesia |
| 2010s | 1,400 t | 2,585 t | 1,186 t | Polynesia |
| 2020s | 1,229 t | 2,145 t | 915.32 t | Polynesia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland potassium, Malta or Polynesia?
- Polynesia, at 2,030 t against 1,194 t in Malta as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland potassium between Malta and Polynesia?
- 836 t, with Polynesia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malta and Polynesia?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Malta and Polynesia rank globally for input — cropland potassium?
- Malta ranks 170th and Polynesia ranks 167th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).