Malta vs Samoa: Input — Cropland potassium
Input — Cropland potassium over time
- Malta
- Samoa
How they compare
Malta currently reports 1,194 t against 830.54 t in Samoa, a difference of 363.46 t.
That makes Malta's figure about 1.4 times Samoa's.
Across all 63 years both countries report, Malta has been ahead every year.
Malta ranks 170th and Samoa ranks 173rd of 201 countries.
Malta has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malta | Samoa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 849.29 t | 379.71 t | 469.58 t | Malta |
| 1970s | 1,228 t | 478.03 t | 750.18 t | Malta |
| 1980s | 1,648 t | 1,081 t | 566.39 t | Malta |
| 1990s | 1,992 t | 1,238 t | 753.88 t | Malta |
| 2000s | 1,901 t | 1,319 t | 581.62 t | Malta |
| 2010s | 1,400 t | 1,212 t | 187.18 t | Malta |
| 2020s | 1,229 t | 832.32 t | 397.01 t | Malta |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland potassium, Malta or Samoa?
- Malta, at 1,194 t against 830.54 t in Samoa as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland potassium between Malta and Samoa?
- 363.46 t, with Malta ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malta and Samoa?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Malta and Samoa rank globally for input — cropland potassium?
- Malta ranks 170th and Samoa ranks 173rd of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).