Mauritania vs North Macedonia: Input — Cropland potassium
Input — Cropland potassium over time
- Mauritania
- North Macedonia
How they compare
North Macedonia currently reports 14,750 t against 10,707 t in Mauritania, a difference of 4,043 t.
That makes North Macedonia's figure about 1.4 times Mauritania's.
Across all 32 years both countries report, North Macedonia has been ahead every year.
Mauritania ranks 122nd and North Macedonia ranks 119th of 186 countries.
North Macedonia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mauritania | North Macedonia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 6,575 t | 29,177 t | 22,602 t | North Macedonia |
| 2000s | 8,280 t | 23,150 t | 14,870 t | North Macedonia |
| 2010s | 9,726 t | 22,238 t | 12,512 t | North Macedonia |
| 2020s | 10,742 t | 17,258 t | 6,516 t | North Macedonia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland potassium, Mauritania or North Macedonia?
- North Macedonia, at 14,750 t against 10,707 t in Mauritania as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland potassium between Mauritania and North Macedonia?
- 4,043 t, with North Macedonia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritania and North Macedonia?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Mauritania and North Macedonia rank globally for input — cropland potassium?
- Mauritania ranks 122nd and North Macedonia ranks 119th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).