Mauritania vs Tunisia: Input — Cropland potassium
Input — Cropland potassium over time
- Mauritania
- Tunisia
How they compare
Tunisia currently reports 13,116 t against 10,707 t in Mauritania, a difference of 2,409 t.
That makes Tunisia's figure about 1.2 times Mauritania's.
Across all 63 years both countries report, Tunisia has been ahead every year.
Mauritania ranks 134th and Tunisia ranks 131st of 201 countries.
Tunisia has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mauritania | Tunisia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 5,432 t | 6,390 t | 957.91 t | Tunisia |
| 1970s | 4,657 t | 8,152 t | 3,495 t | Tunisia |
| 1980s | 5,083 t | 8,866 t | 3,783 t | Tunisia |
| 1990s | 6,478 t | 9,939 t | 3,461 t | Tunisia |
| 2000s | 8,280 t | 13,677 t | 5,397 t | Tunisia |
| 2010s | 9,726 t | 14,767 t | 5,041 t | Tunisia |
| 2020s | 10,742 t | 15,747 t | 5,005 t | Tunisia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland potassium, Mauritania or Tunisia?
- Tunisia, at 13,116 t against 10,707 t in Mauritania as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland potassium between Mauritania and Tunisia?
- 2,409 t, with Tunisia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritania and Tunisia?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Mauritania and Tunisia rank globally for input — cropland potassium?
- Mauritania ranks 134th and Tunisia ranks 131st of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).