Mauritius vs United Arab Emirates: Input — Cropland potassium
Input — Cropland potassium over time
- Mauritius
- United Arab Emirates
How they compare
Mauritius currently reports 2,658 t against 2,533 t in United Arab Emirates, a difference of 125 t.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Mauritius ahead.
Mauritius ranks 162nd and United Arab Emirates ranks 163rd of 201 countries.
Mauritius has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mauritius | United Arab Emirates | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 6,938 t | 65.36 t | 6,873 t | Mauritius |
| 1970s | 10,435 t | 207.34 t | 10,227 t | Mauritius |
| 1980s | 11,080 t | 884.38 t | 10,195 t | Mauritius |
| 1990s | 11,975 t | 3,553 t | 8,421 t | Mauritius |
| 2000s | 12,572 t | 6,495 t | 6,077 t | Mauritius |
| 2010s | 7,064 t | 1,974 t | 5,090 t | Mauritius |
| 2020s | 3,298 t | 2,456 t | 841.98 t | Mauritius |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland potassium, Mauritius or United Arab Emirates?
- Mauritius, at 2,658 t against 2,533 t in United Arab Emirates as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland potassium between Mauritius and United Arab Emirates?
- 125 t, with Mauritius ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritius and United Arab Emirates?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Mauritius and United Arab Emirates rank globally for input — cropland potassium?
- Mauritius ranks 162nd and United Arab Emirates ranks 163rd of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).