Melanesia vs Republic of Moldova: Input — Cropland potassium
Input — Cropland potassium over time
- Melanesia
- Republic of Moldova
How they compare
Melanesia currently reports 33,068 t against 24,860 t in Republic of Moldova, a difference of 8,208 t.
That makes Melanesia's figure about 1.3 times Republic of Moldova's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Republic of Moldova ahead.
Melanesia ranks 13th and Republic of Moldova ranks 14th of 18 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Melanesia averaged higher in 2 and Republic of Moldova in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Melanesia | Republic of Moldova | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 21,052 t | 57,812 t | 36,760 t | Republic of Moldova |
| 2000s | 21,226 t | 28,906 t | 7,680 t | Republic of Moldova |
| 2010s | 30,419 t | 25,915 t | 4,504 t | Melanesia |
| 2020s | 29,591 t | 25,310 t | 4,281 t | Melanesia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland potassium, Melanesia or Republic of Moldova?
- Melanesia, at 33,068 t against 24,860 t in Republic of Moldova as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland potassium between Melanesia and Republic of Moldova?
- 8,208 t, with Melanesia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Melanesia and Republic of Moldova?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Melanesia and Republic of Moldova rank globally for input — cropland potassium?
- Melanesia ranks 13th and Republic of Moldova ranks 14th of 18 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).