Mexico vs Northern Africa: Input — Cropland potassium
Input — Cropland potassium over time
- Mexico
- Northern Africa
How they compare
Mexico currently reports 486,726 t against 385,966 t in Northern Africa, a difference of 100,760 t.
That makes Mexico's figure about 1.3 times Northern Africa's.
Across all 63 years both countries report, Mexico has been ahead every year.
Mexico ranks 24th and Northern Africa ranks 27th of 201 countries.
Mexico has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mexico | Northern Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 147,639 t | 80,107 t | 67,532 t | Mexico |
| 1970s | 222,411 t | 124,906 t | 97,506 t | Mexico |
| 1980s | 311,760 t | 179,587 t | 132,174 t | Mexico |
| 1990s | 322,130 t | 214,353 t | 107,777 t | Mexico |
| 2000s | 419,396 t | 280,001 t | 139,394 t | Mexico |
| 2010s | 492,167 t | 334,106 t | 158,060 t | Mexico |
| 2020s | 531,668 t | 394,379 t | 137,289 t | Mexico |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland potassium, Mexico or Northern Africa?
- Mexico, at 486,726 t against 385,966 t in Northern Africa as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland potassium between Mexico and Northern Africa?
- 100,760 t, with Mexico ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mexico and Northern Africa?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Mexico and Northern Africa rank globally for input — cropland potassium?
- Mexico ranks 24th and Northern Africa ranks 27th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).