Mexico vs Western Asia: Input — Cropland potassium
Input — Cropland potassium over time
- Mexico
- Western Asia
How they compare
Mexico currently reports 486,726 t against 405,376 t in Western Asia, a difference of 81,350 t.
That makes Mexico's figure about 1.2 times Western Asia's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Western Asia ahead.
Mexico ranks 24th and Western Asia ranks 26th of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Mexico averaged higher in 6 and Western Asia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mexico | Western Asia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 147,639 t | 150,688 t | 3,049 t | Western Asia |
| 1970s | 222,411 t | 191,368 t | 31,044 t | Mexico |
| 1980s | 311,760 t | 251,462 t | 60,298 t | Mexico |
| 1990s | 322,130 t | 262,881 t | 59,249 t | Mexico |
| 2000s | 419,396 t | 287,886 t | 131,510 t | Mexico |
| 2010s | 492,167 t | 336,777 t | 155,390 t | Mexico |
| 2020s | 531,668 t | 416,884 t | 114,784 t | Mexico |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland potassium, Mexico or Western Asia?
- Mexico, at 486,726 t against 405,376 t in Western Asia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland potassium between Mexico and Western Asia?
- 81,350 t, with Mexico ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mexico and Western Asia?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Mexico and Western Asia rank globally for input — cropland potassium?
- Mexico ranks 24th and Western Asia ranks 26th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).