Middle Africa vs Türkiye: Input — Cropland potassium
Input — Cropland potassium over time
- Middle Africa
- Türkiye
How they compare
Middle Africa currently reports 239,177 t against 184,236 t in Türkiye, a difference of 54,941 t.
That makes Middle Africa's figure about 1.3 times Türkiye's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Türkiye ahead.
Middle Africa ranks 5th and Türkiye ranks 8th of 18 groups.
Across the 7 decades both report, Middle Africa averaged higher in 2 and Türkiye in 5.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Middle Africa | Türkiye | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 36,188 t | 82,294 t | 46,106 t | Türkiye |
| 1970s | 54,862 t | 92,989 t | 38,127 t | Türkiye |
| 1980s | 70,492 t | 107,422 t | 36,930 t | Türkiye |
| 1990s | 86,281 t | 126,871 t | 40,590 t | Türkiye |
| 2000s | 116,743 t | 133,275 t | 16,533 t | Türkiye |
| 2010s | 176,037 t | 163,501 t | 12,536 t | Middle Africa |
| 2020s | 221,416 t | 188,956 t | 32,461 t | Middle Africa |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland potassium, Middle Africa or Türkiye?
- Middle Africa, at 239,177 t against 184,236 t in Türkiye as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland potassium between Middle Africa and Türkiye?
- 54,941 t, with Middle Africa ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Middle Africa and Türkiye?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Middle Africa and Türkiye rank globally for input — cropland potassium?
- Middle Africa ranks 5th and Türkiye ranks 8th of 18 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).