Middle Africa vs Ukraine: Input — Cropland potassium
Input — Cropland potassium over time
- Middle Africa
- Ukraine
How they compare
Ukraine currently reports 379,194 t against 239,177 t in Middle Africa, a difference of 140,017 t.
That makes Ukraine's figure about 1.6 times Middle Africa's.
Across all 32 years both countries report, Ukraine has been ahead every year.
Middle Africa ranks 28th and Ukraine ranks 27th of 32 groups.
Ukraine has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Middle Africa | Ukraine | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 87,618 t | 1.21 million t | 1.12 million t | Ukraine |
| 2000s | 116,743 t | 593,594 t | 476,851 t | Ukraine |
| 2010s | 176,037 t | 548,860 t | 372,824 t | Ukraine |
| 2020s | 221,416 t | 474,240 t | 252,823 t | Ukraine |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland potassium, Middle Africa or Ukraine?
- Ukraine, at 379,194 t against 239,177 t in Middle Africa as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland potassium between Middle Africa and Ukraine?
- 140,017 t, with Ukraine ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Middle Africa and Ukraine?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Middle Africa and Ukraine rank globally for input — cropland potassium?
- Middle Africa ranks 28th and Ukraine ranks 27th of 32 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).