Middle Africa vs Viet Nam: Input — Cropland potassium
Input — Cropland potassium over time
- Middle Africa
- Viet Nam
How they compare
Viet Nam currently reports 708,468 t against 239,177 t in Middle Africa, a difference of 469,291 t.
That makes Viet Nam's figure about 3.0 times Middle Africa's.
Across all 63 years both countries report, Viet Nam has been ahead every year.
Middle Africa ranks 5th and Viet Nam ranks 3rd of 18 groups.
Viet Nam has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Middle Africa | Viet Nam | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 36,188 t | 130,524 t | 94,336 t | Viet Nam |
| 1970s | 54,862 t | 140,835 t | 85,972 t | Viet Nam |
| 1980s | 70,492 t | 175,944 t | 105,452 t | Viet Nam |
| 1990s | 86,281 t | 288,721 t | 202,440 t | Viet Nam |
| 2000s | 116,743 t | 580,122 t | 463,379 t | Viet Nam |
| 2010s | 176,037 t | 743,682 t | 567,646 t | Viet Nam |
| 2020s | 221,416 t | 792,741 t | 571,324 t | Viet Nam |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland potassium, Middle Africa or Viet Nam?
- Viet Nam, at 708,468 t against 239,177 t in Middle Africa as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland potassium between Middle Africa and Viet Nam?
- 469,291 t, with Viet Nam ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Middle Africa and Viet Nam?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Middle Africa and Viet Nam rank globally for input — cropland potassium?
- Middle Africa ranks 5th and Viet Nam ranks 3rd of 18 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).