Mongolia vs Romania: Input — Cropland potassium
Input — Cropland potassium over time
- Mongolia
- Romania
How they compare
Romania currently reports 245,753 t against 218,120 t in Mongolia, a difference of 27,633 t.
That makes Romania's figure about 1.1 times Mongolia's.
Across all 63 years both countries report, Romania has been ahead every year.
Mongolia ranks 38th and Romania ranks 36th of 201 countries.
Romania has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mongolia | Romania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 83,748 t | 337,014 t | 253,265 t | Romania |
| 1970s | 94,156 t | 464,493 t | 370,337 t | Romania |
| 1980s | 101,392 t | 667,956 t | 566,564 t | Romania |
| 1990s | 121,191 t | 356,376 t | 235,185 t | Romania |
| 2000s | 109,372 t | 260,208 t | 150,836 t | Romania |
| 2010s | 157,557 t | 243,313 t | 85,756 t | Romania |
| 2020s | 218,642 t | 249,752 t | 31,110 t | Romania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland potassium, Mongolia or Romania?
- Romania, at 245,753 t against 218,120 t in Mongolia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland potassium between Mongolia and Romania?
- 27,633 t, with Romania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mongolia and Romania?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Mongolia and Romania rank globally for input — cropland potassium?
- Mongolia ranks 38th and Romania ranks 36th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).