Myanmar vs Oceania: Input — Cropland potassium
Input — Cropland potassium over time
- Myanmar
- Oceania
How they compare
Myanmar currently reports 465,979 t against 418,510 t in Oceania, a difference of 47,469 t.
That makes Myanmar's figure about 1.1 times Oceania's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Oceania ahead.
Myanmar ranks 25th and Oceania ranks 25th of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Myanmar averaged higher in 3 and Oceania in 4.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Myanmar | Oceania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 166,104 t | 200,901 t | 34,796 t | Oceania |
| 1970s | 212,032 t | 276,059 t | 64,026 t | Oceania |
| 1980s | 276,486 t | 278,718 t | 2,232 t | Oceania |
| 1990s | 288,700 t | 335,077 t | 46,377 t | Oceania |
| 2000s | 370,486 t | 368,829 t | 1,658 t | Myanmar |
| 2010s | 536,303 t | 381,009 t | 155,293 t | Myanmar |
| 2020s | 433,418 t | 424,804 t | 8,614 t | Myanmar |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland potassium, Myanmar or Oceania?
- Myanmar, at 465,979 t against 418,510 t in Oceania as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland potassium between Myanmar and Oceania?
- 47,469 t, with Myanmar ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Myanmar and Oceania?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Myanmar and Oceania rank globally for input — cropland potassium?
- Myanmar ranks 25th and Oceania ranks 25th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).