Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) vs Republic of Moldova: Input — Cropland potassium

Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs)
5.29 million t
in 2023
Republic of Moldova
24,860 t
in 2023
Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) rank
11th
Republic of Moldova rank
14th

Input — Cropland potassium over time

  • Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs)
  • Republic of Moldova
02.0M4.0M6.0M196119922023

How they compare

Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) currently reports 5.29 million t against 24,860 t in Republic of Moldova, a difference of 5.26 million t.

That makes Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs)'s figure about 212.6 times Republic of Moldova's.

Across all 32 years both countries report, Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) has been ahead every year.

Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) ranks 11th and Republic of Moldova ranks 14th of 29 groups.

Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) Republic of Moldova Difference Ahead
1990s 2.67 million t 57,812 t 2.61 million t Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs)
2000s 3.25 million t 28,906 t 3.22 million t Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs)
2010s 4.55 million t 25,915 t 4.52 million t Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs)
2020s 5.19 million t 25,310 t 5.17 million t Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher input — cropland potassium, Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) or Republic of Moldova?
Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs), at 5.29 million t against 24,860 t in Republic of Moldova as of 2023.
What is the difference in input — cropland potassium between Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) and Republic of Moldova?
5.26 million t, with Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) and Republic of Moldova?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) and Republic of Moldova rank globally for input — cropland potassium?
Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) ranks 11th and Republic of Moldova ranks 14th of 29 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) vs Republic of Moldova: Input — Cropland potassium. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/input-cropland-potassium/net-food-importing-developing-countries-nfidcs/republic-of-moldova/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/input-cropland-potassium/net-food-importing-developing-countries-nfidcs/republic-of-moldova/">Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) vs Republic of Moldova: Input — Cropland potassium</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Input — Cropland potassium
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
233 places, 13,500 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).