New Caledonia vs Suriname: Input — Cropland potassium
Input — Cropland potassium over time
- New Caledonia
- Suriname
How they compare
Suriname currently reports 1,186 t against 1,148 t in New Caledonia, a difference of 38 t.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was New Caledonia ahead.
New Caledonia ranks 172nd and Suriname ranks 171st of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, New Caledonia averaged higher in 1 and Suriname in 6.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | New Caledonia | Suriname | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 859.03 t | 740.03 t | 119 t | New Caledonia |
| 1970s | 915.6 t | 932.15 t | 16.55 t | Suriname |
| 1980s | 1,047 t | 1,694 t | 646.81 t | Suriname |
| 1990s | 1,058 t | 1,411 t | 352.91 t | Suriname |
| 2000s | 1,153 t | 1,722 t | 568.36 t | Suriname |
| 2010s | 1,128 t | 1,888 t | 760.17 t | Suriname |
| 2020s | 1,155 t | 1,361 t | 205.96 t | Suriname |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland potassium, New Caledonia or Suriname?
- Suriname, at 1,186 t against 1,148 t in New Caledonia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland potassium between New Caledonia and Suriname?
- 38 t, with Suriname ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for New Caledonia and Suriname?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do New Caledonia and Suriname rank globally for input — cropland potassium?
- New Caledonia ranks 172nd and Suriname ranks 171st of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).