New Zealand vs Panama: Input — Cropland potassium
Input — Cropland potassium over time
- New Zealand
- Panama
How they compare
Panama currently reports 28,409 t against 27,472 t in New Zealand, a difference of 937 t.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was New Zealand ahead.
New Zealand ranks 114th and Panama ranks 112th of 201 countries.
New Zealand has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | New Zealand | Panama | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 17,935 t | 7,431 t | 10,504 t | New Zealand |
| 1970s | 23,929 t | 11,794 t | 12,135 t | New Zealand |
| 1980s | 21,154 t | 15,838 t | 5,316 t | New Zealand |
| 1990s | 24,950 t | 14,548 t | 10,402 t | New Zealand |
| 2000s | 28,751 t | 15,283 t | 13,468 t | New Zealand |
| 2010s | 30,488 t | 24,020 t | 6,469 t | New Zealand |
| 2020s | 30,143 t | 28,508 t | 1,635 t | New Zealand |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland potassium, New Zealand or Panama?
- Panama, at 28,409 t against 27,472 t in New Zealand as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland potassium between New Zealand and Panama?
- 937 t, with Panama ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for New Zealand and Panama?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do New Zealand and Panama rank globally for input — cropland potassium?
- New Zealand ranks 114th and Panama ranks 112th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).