New Zealand vs Slovenia: Input — Cropland potassium
Input — Cropland potassium over time
- New Zealand
- Slovenia
How they compare
New Zealand currently reports 27,472 t against 25,562 t in Slovenia, a difference of 1,910 t.
That makes New Zealand's figure about 1.1 times Slovenia's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Slovenia ahead.
New Zealand ranks 114th and Slovenia ranks 117th of 201 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, New Zealand averaged higher in 2 and Slovenia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | New Zealand | Slovenia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 26,033 t | 41,039 t | 15,007 t | Slovenia |
| 2000s | 28,751 t | 33,815 t | 5,064 t | Slovenia |
| 2010s | 30,488 t | 26,827 t | 3,662 t | New Zealand |
| 2020s | 30,143 t | 25,114 t | 5,029 t | New Zealand |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland potassium, New Zealand or Slovenia?
- New Zealand, at 27,472 t against 25,562 t in Slovenia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland potassium between New Zealand and Slovenia?
- 1,910 t, with New Zealand ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for New Zealand and Slovenia?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do New Zealand and Slovenia rank globally for input — cropland potassium?
- New Zealand ranks 114th and Slovenia ranks 117th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).