Norway vs Papua New Guinea: Input — Cropland potassium
Input — Cropland potassium over time
- Norway
- Papua New Guinea
How they compare
Papua New Guinea currently reports 24,219 t against 23,511 t in Norway, a difference of 708 t.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Norway ahead.
Norway ranks 121st and Papua New Guinea ranks 120th of 201 countries.
Norway has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Norway | Papua New Guinea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 37,482 t | 4,168 t | 33,314 t | Norway |
| 1970s | 38,487 t | 6,562 t | 31,924 t | Norway |
| 1980s | 38,864 t | 8,607 t | 30,258 t | Norway |
| 1990s | 35,295 t | 10,301 t | 24,993 t | Norway |
| 2000s | 30,677 t | 13,784 t | 16,893 t | Norway |
| 2010s | 26,588 t | 21,990 t | 4,597 t | Norway |
| 2020s | 25,431 t | 21,593 t | 3,838 t | Norway |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland potassium, Norway or Papua New Guinea?
- Papua New Guinea, at 24,219 t against 23,511 t in Norway as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland potassium between Norway and Papua New Guinea?
- 708 t, with Papua New Guinea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Norway and Papua New Guinea?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Norway and Papua New Guinea rank globally for input — cropland potassium?
- Norway ranks 121st and Papua New Guinea ranks 120th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).