Norway vs Togo: Input — Cropland potassium

Norway
23,511 t
in 2023
Togo
21,796 t
in 2023
Norway rank
121st
Togo rank
124th

Input — Cropland potassium over time

  • Norway
  • Togo
010.0k20.0k30.0k40.0k196119922023

How they compare

Norway currently reports 23,511 t against 21,796 t in Togo, a difference of 1,715 t.

That makes Norway's figure about 1.1 times Togo's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Norway has been ahead every year.

Norway ranks 121st and Togo ranks 124th of 201 countries.

Norway has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Norway Togo Difference Ahead
1960s 37,482 t 2,583 t 34,899 t Norway
1970s 38,487 t 3,186 t 35,301 t Norway
1980s 38,864 t 4,915 t 33,949 t Norway
1990s 35,295 t 7,393 t 27,902 t Norway
2000s 30,677 t 8,502 t 22,176 t Norway
2010s 26,588 t 16,537 t 10,051 t Norway
2020s 25,431 t 17,500 t 7,931 t Norway

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher input — cropland potassium, Norway or Togo?
Norway, at 23,511 t against 21,796 t in Togo as of 2023.
What is the difference in input — cropland potassium between Norway and Togo?
1,715 t, with Norway ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Norway and Togo?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Norway and Togo rank globally for input — cropland potassium?
Norway ranks 121st and Togo ranks 124th of 201 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Input — Cropland potassium
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
233 places, 13,500 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).