Oceania vs Ukraine: Input — Cropland potassium
Input — Cropland potassium over time
- Oceania
- Ukraine
How they compare
Oceania currently reports 418,510 t against 379,194 t in Ukraine, a difference of 39,316 t.
That makes Oceania's figure about 1.1 times Ukraine's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Ukraine ahead.
Oceania ranks 25th and Ukraine ranks 27th of 32 groups.
Ukraine has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Oceania | Ukraine | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 348,601 t | 1.21 million t | 860,945 t | Ukraine |
| 2000s | 368,829 t | 593,594 t | 224,765 t | Ukraine |
| 2010s | 381,009 t | 548,860 t | 167,851 t | Ukraine |
| 2020s | 424,804 t | 474,240 t | 49,436 t | Ukraine |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland potassium, Oceania or Ukraine?
- Oceania, at 418,510 t against 379,194 t in Ukraine as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland potassium between Oceania and Ukraine?
- 39,316 t, with Oceania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Oceania and Ukraine?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Oceania and Ukraine rank globally for input — cropland potassium?
- Oceania ranks 25th and Ukraine ranks 27th of 32 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).