Oman vs Tunisia: Input — Cropland potassium
Input — Cropland potassium over time
- Oman
- Tunisia
How they compare
Tunisia currently reports 13,116 t against 11,072 t in Oman, a difference of 2,044 t.
That makes Tunisia's figure about 1.2 times Oman's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Tunisia ahead.
Oman ranks 132nd and Tunisia ranks 131st of 201 countries.
Tunisia has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Oman | Tunisia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 266.1 t | 6,390 t | 6,124 t | Tunisia |
| 1970s | 430.96 t | 8,152 t | 7,721 t | Tunisia |
| 1980s | 995.21 t | 8,866 t | 7,871 t | Tunisia |
| 1990s | 1,841 t | 9,939 t | 8,098 t | Tunisia |
| 2000s | 6,307 t | 13,677 t | 7,370 t | Tunisia |
| 2010s | 9,604 t | 14,767 t | 5,163 t | Tunisia |
| 2020s | 13,852 t | 15,747 t | 1,895 t | Tunisia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland potassium, Oman or Tunisia?
- Tunisia, at 13,116 t against 11,072 t in Oman as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland potassium between Oman and Tunisia?
- 2,044 t, with Tunisia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Oman and Tunisia?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Oman and Tunisia rank globally for input — cropland potassium?
- Oman ranks 132nd and Tunisia ranks 131st of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).