Papua New Guinea vs Slovenia: Input — Cropland potassium
Input — Cropland potassium over time
- Papua New Guinea
- Slovenia
How they compare
Slovenia currently reports 25,562 t against 24,219 t in Papua New Guinea, a difference of 1,343 t.
That makes Slovenia's figure about 1.1 times Papua New Guinea's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Slovenia ahead.
Papua New Guinea ranks 120th and Slovenia ranks 117th of 201 countries.
Slovenia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Papua New Guinea | Slovenia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 10,610 t | 41,039 t | 30,429 t | Slovenia |
| 2000s | 13,784 t | 33,815 t | 20,031 t | Slovenia |
| 2010s | 21,990 t | 26,827 t | 4,836 t | Slovenia |
| 2020s | 21,593 t | 25,114 t | 3,521 t | Slovenia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland potassium, Papua New Guinea or Slovenia?
- Slovenia, at 25,562 t against 24,219 t in Papua New Guinea as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland potassium between Papua New Guinea and Slovenia?
- 1,343 t, with Slovenia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Papua New Guinea and Slovenia?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Papua New Guinea and Slovenia rank globally for input — cropland potassium?
- Papua New Guinea ranks 120th and Slovenia ranks 117th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).