Paraguay vs Sudan (former): Input — Cropland potassium
Input — Cropland potassium over time
- Paraguay
- Sudan (former)
How they compare
Paraguay currently reports 175,734 t against 147,936 t in Sudan (former), a difference of 27,798 t.
That makes Paraguay's figure about 1.2 times Sudan (former)'s.
Across all 51 years both countries report, Sudan (former) has been ahead every year.
Paraguay ranks 42nd and Sudan (former) ranks 45th of 186 countries.
Sudan (former) has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Paraguay | Sudan (former) | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 10,445 t | 21,807 t | 11,362 t | Sudan (former) |
| 1970s | 14,715 t | 29,799 t | 15,084 t | Sudan (former) |
| 1980s | 23,444 t | 47,199 t | 23,755 t | Sudan (former) |
| 1990s | 41,779 t | 75,560 t | 33,781 t | Sudan (former) |
| 2000s | 89,147 t | 136,954 t | 47,808 t | Sudan (former) |
| 2010s | 127,700 t | 150,002 t | 22,301 t | Sudan (former) |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland potassium, Paraguay or Sudan (former)?
- Paraguay, at 175,734 t against 147,936 t in Sudan (former) as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland potassium between Paraguay and Sudan (former)?
- 27,798 t, with Paraguay ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Paraguay and Sudan (former)?
- 51 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2011.
- How do Paraguay and Sudan (former) rank globally for input — cropland potassium?
- Paraguay ranks 42nd and Sudan (former) ranks 45th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).