Poland vs Uzbekistan: Input — Cropland potassium
Input — Cropland potassium over time
- Poland
- Uzbekistan
How they compare
Poland currently reports 656,882 t against 592,471 t in Uzbekistan, a difference of 64,411 t.
That makes Poland's figure about 1.1 times Uzbekistan's.
Across all 32 years both countries report, Poland has been ahead every year.
Poland ranks 17th and Uzbekistan ranks 18th of 201 countries.
Poland has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Poland | Uzbekistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 745,924 t | 232,126 t | 513,798 t | Poland |
| 2000s | 717,528 t | 239,111 t | 478,418 t | Poland |
| 2010s | 742,036 t | 412,130 t | 329,906 t | Poland |
| 2020s | 722,799 t | 539,614 t | 183,185 t | Poland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland potassium, Poland or Uzbekistan?
- Poland, at 656,882 t against 592,471 t in Uzbekistan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland potassium between Poland and Uzbekistan?
- 64,411 t, with Poland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Poland and Uzbekistan?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Poland and Uzbekistan rank globally for input — cropland potassium?
- Poland ranks 17th and Uzbekistan ranks 18th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).