Polynesia vs Uzbekistan: Input — Cropland potassium
Input — Cropland potassium over time
- Polynesia
- Uzbekistan
How they compare
Uzbekistan currently reports 592,471 t against 2,030 t in Polynesia, a difference of 590,441 t.
That makes Uzbekistan's figure about 291.9 times Polynesia's.
Across all 32 years both countries report, Uzbekistan has been ahead every year.
Polynesia ranks 17th and Uzbekistan ranks 17th of 18 countries.
Uzbekistan has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Polynesia | Uzbekistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 2,609 t | 232,126 t | 229,517 t | Uzbekistan |
| 2000s | 2,697 t | 239,111 t | 236,414 t | Uzbekistan |
| 2010s | 2,585 t | 412,130 t | 409,545 t | Uzbekistan |
| 2020s | 2,145 t | 539,614 t | 537,469 t | Uzbekistan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland potassium, Polynesia or Uzbekistan?
- Uzbekistan, at 592,471 t against 2,030 t in Polynesia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland potassium between Polynesia and Uzbekistan?
- 590,441 t, with Uzbekistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Polynesia and Uzbekistan?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Polynesia and Uzbekistan rank globally for input — cropland potassium?
- Polynesia ranks 17th and Uzbekistan ranks 17th of 18 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).