Puerto Rico vs Sierra Leone: Input — Cropland potassium
Input — Cropland potassium over time
- Puerto Rico
- Sierra Leone
How they compare
Sierra Leone currently reports 5,797 t against 5,361 t in Puerto Rico, a difference of 436 t.
That makes Sierra Leone's figure about 1.1 times Puerto Rico's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Puerto Rico ahead.
Puerto Rico ranks 152nd and Sierra Leone ranks 149th of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Puerto Rico averaged higher in 6 and Sierra Leone in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Puerto Rico | Sierra Leone | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 11,545 t | 1,164 t | 10,380 t | Puerto Rico |
| 1970s | 12,949 t | 1,526 t | 11,423 t | Puerto Rico |
| 1980s | 10,470 t | 1,943 t | 8,527 t | Puerto Rico |
| 1990s | 8,097 t | 2,339 t | 5,758 t | Puerto Rico |
| 2000s | 6,537 t | 1,767 t | 4,770 t | Puerto Rico |
| 2010s | 6,360 t | 4,380 t | 1,980 t | Puerto Rico |
| 2020s | 5,806 t | 5,833 t | 26.4 t | Sierra Leone |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland potassium, Puerto Rico or Sierra Leone?
- Sierra Leone, at 5,797 t against 5,361 t in Puerto Rico as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland potassium between Puerto Rico and Sierra Leone?
- 436 t, with Sierra Leone ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Puerto Rico and Sierra Leone?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Puerto Rico and Sierra Leone rank globally for input — cropland potassium?
- Puerto Rico ranks 152nd and Sierra Leone ranks 149th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).