Rwanda vs Tunisia: Input — Cropland potassium
Input — Cropland potassium over time
- Rwanda
- Tunisia
How they compare
Rwanda currently reports 16,693 t against 13,116 t in Tunisia, a difference of 3,577 t.
That makes Rwanda's figure about 1.3 times Tunisia's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Tunisia ahead.
Rwanda ranks 129th and Tunisia ranks 131st of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Rwanda averaged higher in 2 and Tunisia in 5.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Rwanda | Tunisia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 2,039 t | 6,390 t | 4,351 t | Tunisia |
| 1970s | 2,706 t | 8,152 t | 5,446 t | Tunisia |
| 1980s | 3,543 t | 8,866 t | 5,323 t | Tunisia |
| 1990s | 3,845 t | 9,939 t | 6,094 t | Tunisia |
| 2000s | 8,228 t | 13,677 t | 5,449 t | Tunisia |
| 2010s | 16,438 t | 14,767 t | 1,671 t | Rwanda |
| 2020s | 18,853 t | 15,747 t | 3,107 t | Rwanda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland potassium, Rwanda or Tunisia?
- Rwanda, at 16,693 t against 13,116 t in Tunisia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland potassium between Rwanda and Tunisia?
- 3,577 t, with Rwanda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Rwanda and Tunisia?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Rwanda and Tunisia rank globally for input — cropland potassium?
- Rwanda ranks 129th and Tunisia ranks 131st of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).