Slovakia vs Zimbabwe: Input — Cropland potassium
Input — Cropland potassium over time
- Slovakia
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Slovakia currently reports 37,790 t against 35,617 t in Zimbabwe, a difference of 2,173 t.
That makes Slovakia's figure about 1.1 times Zimbabwe's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Slovakia ahead.
Slovakia ranks 103rd and Zimbabwe ranks 106th of 201 countries.
Slovakia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Slovakia | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 74,679 t | 43,651 t | 31,028 t | Slovakia |
| 2000s | 53,061 t | 29,214 t | 23,848 t | Slovakia |
| 2010s | 43,621 t | 36,474 t | 7,147 t | Slovakia |
| 2020s | 41,724 t | 36,494 t | 5,230 t | Slovakia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland potassium, Slovakia or Zimbabwe?
- Slovakia, at 37,790 t against 35,617 t in Zimbabwe as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland potassium between Slovakia and Zimbabwe?
- 2,173 t, with Slovakia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Slovakia and Zimbabwe?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
- How do Slovakia and Zimbabwe rank globally for input — cropland potassium?
- Slovakia ranks 103rd and Zimbabwe ranks 106th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).