Solomon Islands vs Tonga: Input — Cropland potassium
Input — Cropland potassium over time
- Solomon Islands
- Tonga
How they compare
Tonga currently reports 599.24 t against 491.08 t in Solomon Islands, a difference of 108.16 t.
That makes Tonga's figure about 1.2 times Solomon Islands's.
The two have swapped places 11 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Solomon Islands ahead.
Solomon Islands ranks 179th and Tonga ranks 178th of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Solomon Islands averaged higher in 2 and Tonga in 5.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Solomon Islands | Tonga | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 207.2 t | 212.4 t | 5.2 t | Tonga |
| 1970s | 379.14 t | 398.82 t | 19.68 t | Tonga |
| 1980s | 447.17 t | 659.25 t | 212.08 t | Tonga |
| 1990s | 442.16 t | 594.87 t | 152.71 t | Tonga |
| 2000s | 486.17 t | 570.55 t | 84.38 t | Tonga |
| 2010s | 983.68 t | 634.47 t | 349.22 t | Solomon Islands |
| 2020s | 847.89 t | 624.69 t | 223.2 t | Solomon Islands |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland potassium, Solomon Islands or Tonga?
- Tonga, at 599.24 t against 491.08 t in Solomon Islands as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland potassium between Solomon Islands and Tonga?
- 108.16 t, with Tonga ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Solomon Islands and Tonga?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Solomon Islands and Tonga rank globally for input — cropland potassium?
- Solomon Islands ranks 179th and Tonga ranks 178th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).