South Sudan vs Switzerland: Input — Cropland potassium
Input — Cropland potassium over time
- South Sudan
- Switzerland
How they compare
Switzerland currently reports 71,248 t against 70,564 t in South Sudan, a difference of 684 t.
Across all 12 years both countries report, Switzerland has been ahead every year.
South Sudan ranks 82nd and Switzerland ranks 81st of 201 countries.
Switzerland has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | South Sudan | Switzerland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 62,507 t | 78,863 t | 16,355 t | Switzerland |
| 2020s | 69,159 t | 74,742 t | 5,583 t | Switzerland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland potassium, South Sudan or Switzerland?
- Switzerland, at 71,248 t against 70,564 t in South Sudan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland potassium between South Sudan and Switzerland?
- 684 t, with Switzerland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for South Sudan and Switzerland?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2023.
- How do South Sudan and Switzerland rank globally for input — cropland potassium?
- South Sudan ranks 82nd and Switzerland ranks 81st of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).