Southern Europe vs Uzbekistan: Input — Cropland potassium
Input — Cropland potassium over time
- Southern Europe
- Uzbekistan
How they compare
Southern Europe currently reports 1.68 million t against 592,471 t in Uzbekistan, a difference of 1.09 million t.
That makes Southern Europe's figure about 2.8 times Uzbekistan's.
Across all 32 years both countries report, Southern Europe has been ahead every year.
Southern Europe ranks 10th and Uzbekistan ranks 17th of 38 regions.
Southern Europe has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Southern Europe | Uzbekistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 2.32 million t | 232,126 t | 2.08 million t | Southern Europe |
| 2000s | 2.12 million t | 239,111 t | 1.88 million t | Southern Europe |
| 2010s | 1.84 million t | 412,130 t | 1.43 million t | Southern Europe |
| 2020s | 1.78 million t | 539,614 t | 1.24 million t | Southern Europe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland potassium, Southern Europe or Uzbekistan?
- Southern Europe, at 1.68 million t against 592,471 t in Uzbekistan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland potassium between Southern Europe and Uzbekistan?
- 1.09 million t, with Southern Europe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Southern Europe and Uzbekistan?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Southern Europe and Uzbekistan rank globally for input — cropland potassium?
- Southern Europe ranks 10th and Uzbekistan ranks 17th of 38 regions.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).