Sudan vs Tajikistan: Input — Cropland potassium

Sudan
98,751 t
in 2023
Tajikistan
96,144 t
in 2023
Sudan rank
65th
Tajikistan rank
68th

Input — Cropland potassium over time

  • Sudan
  • Tajikistan
025.0k50.0k75.0k100.0k199220072023

How they compare

Sudan currently reports 98,751 t against 96,144 t in Tajikistan, a difference of 2,607 t.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2012 it was Sudan ahead.

Sudan ranks 65th and Tajikistan ranks 68th of 201 countries.

Sudan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Sudan Tajikistan Difference Ahead
2010s 99,334 t 85,500 t 13,834 t Sudan
2020s 99,117 t 97,454 t 1,663 t Sudan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher input — cropland potassium, Sudan or Tajikistan?
Sudan, at 98,751 t against 96,144 t in Tajikistan as of 2023.
What is the difference in input — cropland potassium between Sudan and Tajikistan?
2,607 t, with Sudan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Sudan and Tajikistan?
12 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2023.
How do Sudan and Tajikistan rank globally for input — cropland potassium?
Sudan ranks 65th and Tajikistan ranks 68th of 201 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Input — Cropland potassium
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
233 places, 13,500 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).