Sweden vs Switzerland: Input — Cropland potassium
Input — Cropland potassium over time
- Sweden
- Switzerland
How they compare
Sweden currently reports 77,557 t against 71,248 t in Switzerland, a difference of 6,309 t.
That makes Sweden's figure about 1.1 times Switzerland's.
Across all 63 years both countries report, Sweden has been ahead every year.
Sweden ranks 78th and Switzerland ranks 81st of 201 countries.
Sweden has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Sweden | Switzerland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 192,582 t | 120,472 t | 72,110 t | Sweden |
| 1970s | 184,822 t | 128,391 t | 56,430 t | Sweden |
| 1980s | 158,114 t | 127,237 t | 30,877 t | Sweden |
| 1990s | 121,619 t | 107,244 t | 14,375 t | Sweden |
| 2000s | 100,817 t | 86,337 t | 14,481 t | Sweden |
| 2010s | 87,857 t | 79,651 t | 8,206 t | Sweden |
| 2020s | 81,814 t | 74,742 t | 7,072 t | Sweden |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland potassium, Sweden or Switzerland?
- Sweden, at 77,557 t against 71,248 t in Switzerland as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland potassium between Sweden and Switzerland?
- 6,309 t, with Sweden ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Sweden and Switzerland?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Sweden and Switzerland rank globally for input — cropland potassium?
- Sweden ranks 78th and Switzerland ranks 81st of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).