Ukraine vs Western Africa: Input — Cropland potassium
Input — Cropland potassium over time
- Ukraine
- Western Africa
How they compare
Western Africa currently reports 682,821 t against 379,194 t in Ukraine, a difference of 303,627 t.
That makes Western Africa's figure about 1.8 times Ukraine's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Ukraine ahead.
Ukraine ranks 27th and Western Africa ranks 24th of 201 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Ukraine averaged higher in 2 and Western Africa in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ukraine | Western Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 1.21 million t | 334,949 t | 874,598 t | Ukraine |
| 2000s | 593,594 t | 420,939 t | 172,655 t | Ukraine |
| 2010s | 548,860 t | 589,320 t | 40,459 t | Western Africa |
| 2020s | 474,240 t | 717,897 t | 243,657 t | Western Africa |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland potassium, Ukraine or Western Africa?
- Western Africa, at 682,821 t against 379,194 t in Ukraine as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland potassium between Ukraine and Western Africa?
- 303,627 t, with Western Africa ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ukraine and Western Africa?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Ukraine and Western Africa rank globally for input — cropland potassium?
- Ukraine ranks 27th and Western Africa ranks 24th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).