Uzbekistan vs Viet Nam: Input — Cropland potassium
Input — Cropland potassium over time
- Uzbekistan
- Viet Nam
How they compare
Viet Nam currently reports 708,468 t against 592,471 t in Uzbekistan, a difference of 115,997 t.
That makes Viet Nam's figure about 1.2 times Uzbekistan's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Uzbekistan ahead.
Uzbekistan ranks 18th and Viet Nam ranks 15th of 201 countries.
Viet Nam has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Uzbekistan | Viet Nam | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 232,126 t | 313,865 t | 81,740 t | Viet Nam |
| 2000s | 239,111 t | 580,122 t | 341,011 t | Viet Nam |
| 2010s | 412,130 t | 743,682 t | 331,552 t | Viet Nam |
| 2020s | 539,614 t | 792,741 t | 253,127 t | Viet Nam |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland potassium, Uzbekistan or Viet Nam?
- Viet Nam, at 708,468 t against 592,471 t in Uzbekistan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland potassium between Uzbekistan and Viet Nam?
- 115,997 t, with Viet Nam ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Uzbekistan and Viet Nam?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Uzbekistan and Viet Nam rank globally for input — cropland potassium?
- Uzbekistan ranks 18th and Viet Nam ranks 15th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).