Uzbekistan vs Western Europe: Input — Cropland potassium
Input — Cropland potassium over time
- Uzbekistan
- Western Europe
How they compare
Western Europe currently reports 2.61 million t against 592,471 t in Uzbekistan, a difference of 2.02 million t.
That makes Western Europe's figure about 4.4 times Uzbekistan's.
Across all 32 years both countries report, Western Europe has been ahead every year.
Uzbekistan ranks 18th and Western Europe ranks 17th of 201 countries.
Western Europe has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Uzbekistan | Western Europe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 232,126 t | 4.37 million t | 4.14 million t | Western Europe |
| 2000s | 239,111 t | 3.47 million t | 3.24 million t | Western Europe |
| 2010s | 412,130 t | 3.08 million t | 2.67 million t | Western Europe |
| 2020s | 539,614 t | 2.73 million t | 2.19 million t | Western Europe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland potassium, Uzbekistan or Western Europe?
- Western Europe, at 2.61 million t against 592,471 t in Uzbekistan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland potassium between Uzbekistan and Western Europe?
- 2.02 million t, with Western Europe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Uzbekistan and Western Europe?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Uzbekistan and Western Europe rank globally for input — cropland potassium?
- Uzbekistan ranks 18th and Western Europe ranks 17th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).