Western Europe vs Yugoslav SFR: Input — Cropland potassium
Input — Cropland potassium over time
- Western Europe
- Yugoslav SFR
How they compare
Western Europe currently reports 2.61 million t against 523,039 t in Yugoslav SFR, a difference of 2.09 million t.
That makes Western Europe's figure about 5.0 times Yugoslav SFR's.
Across all 31 years both countries report, Western Europe has been ahead every year.
Western Europe ranks 17th and Yugoslav SFR ranks 20th of 32 groups.
Western Europe has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Western Europe | Yugoslav SFR | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 5.33 million t | 498,550 t | 4.83 million t | Western Europe |
| 1970s | 6.00 million t | 585,905 t | 5.42 million t | Western Europe |
| 1980s | 6.04 million t | 657,038 t | 5.39 million t | Western Europe |
| 1990s | 5.19 million t | 547,428 t | 4.64 million t | Western Europe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland potassium, Western Europe or Yugoslav SFR?
- Western Europe, at 2.61 million t against 523,039 t in Yugoslav SFR as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland potassium between Western Europe and Yugoslav SFR?
- 2.09 million t, with Western Europe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Western Europe and Yugoslav SFR?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1991.
- How do Western Europe and Yugoslav SFR rank globally for input — cropland potassium?
- Western Europe ranks 17th and Yugoslav SFR ranks 20th of 32 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).