Chile vs Estonia: Intensity of use of forest resources — Gross Increment

Chile
113,613 Cubic metres
in 2023
Estonia
12,423 Cubic metres
in 2024
Chile rank
2nd
Estonia rank
4th

Intensity of use of forest resources — Gross Increment over time

  • Chile
  • Estonia
025.0k50.0k75.0k100.0k125.0k195019872024

How they compare

Chile currently reports 113,613 Cubic metres against 12,423 Cubic metres in Estonia, a difference of 101,190 Cubic metres.

That makes Chile's figure about 9.1 times Estonia's.

Across all 17 years both countries report, Chile has been ahead every year.

Chile ranks 2nd and Estonia ranks 4th of 23 countries.

Chile has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chile Estonia Difference Ahead
1950s 20,659 Cubic metres 7,065 Cubic metres 13,594 Cubic metres Chile
1990s 76,707 Cubic metres 8,856 Cubic metres 67,851 Cubic metres Chile
2000s 85,835 Cubic metres 12,943 Cubic metres 72,892 Cubic metres Chile
2010s 105,455 Cubic metres 13,960 Cubic metres 91,495 Cubic metres Chile
2020s 118,298 Cubic metres 12,956 Cubic metres 105,343 Cubic metres Chile

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher intensity of use of forest resources — gross increment, Chile or Estonia?
Chile, at 113,613 Cubic metres against 12,423 Cubic metres in Estonia as of 2023.
What is the difference in intensity of use of forest resources — gross increment between Chile and Estonia?
101,190 Cubic metres, with Chile ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Estonia?
17 years are reported by both, from 1950 to 2023.
How do Chile and Estonia rank globally for intensity of use of forest resources — gross increment?
Chile ranks 2nd and Estonia ranks 4th of 23 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Intensity of use of forest resources — Gross Increment. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chile vs Estonia: Intensity of use of forest resources — Gross Increment. Statizoid, drawing on Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Retrieved 29 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/intensity-of-use-of-forest-resources-gross-increment/chile/estonia-2/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/intensity-of-use-of-forest-resources-gross-increment/chile/estonia-2/">Chile vs Estonia: Intensity of use of forest resources — Gross Increment</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Intensity of use of forest resources — Gross Increment
Unit
Cubic metres
Source
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
Licence
OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
32 places, 670 data points, 1950–2024
Last refreshed

This dataset traces net changes in terms of volume in the growing stock of standing wood on forest land. Forest depletion and growth describe balances or imbalances in different types of forests. The intensity of use of forest resources reflects various forest management methods and their sustainability. These data should be read in connection with other indicators, in particular land use changes and forest quality (species diversity, forest degradation), and be complemented with data on forest management practices and protection measures. Please bear in mind that definitions and estimation methods vary for some countries. For details see: Data source(s): OECD Annual Quality Assurance (AQA) questionnaire. Contact: ENV.Stat@oecd.org Dataset release date: March, 2026 Definitions Country metadata