Chile vs Latvia: Intensity of use of forest resources — Gross Increment
Intensity of use of forest resources — Gross Increment over time
- Chile
- Latvia
How they compare
Chile currently reports 113,613 Cubic metres against 24,741 Cubic metres in Latvia, a difference of 88,872 Cubic metres.
That makes Chile's figure about 4.6 times Latvia's.
Across all 14 years both countries report, Chile has been ahead every year.
Chile ranks 2nd and Latvia ranks 2nd of 23 countries.
Chile has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 88,819 Cubic metres | 25,280 Cubic metres | 63,539 Cubic metres | Chile |
| 2010s | 105,455 Cubic metres | 26,038 Cubic metres | 79,416 Cubic metres | Chile |
| 2020s | 118,298 Cubic metres | 26,430 Cubic metres | 91,868 Cubic metres | Chile |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher intensity of use of forest resources — gross increment, Chile or Latvia?
- Chile, at 113,613 Cubic metres against 24,741 Cubic metres in Latvia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in intensity of use of forest resources — gross increment between Chile and Latvia?
- 88,872 Cubic metres, with Chile ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Latvia?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2023.
- How do Chile and Latvia rank globally for intensity of use of forest resources — gross increment?
- Chile ranks 2nd and Latvia ranks 2nd of 23 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Intensity of use of forest resources — Gross Increment. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
This dataset traces net changes in terms of volume in the growing stock of standing wood on forest land. Forest depletion and growth describe balances or imbalances in different types of forests. The intensity of use of forest resources reflects various forest management methods and their sustainability. These data should be read in connection with other indicators, in particular land use changes and forest quality (species diversity, forest degradation), and be complemented with data on forest management practices and protection measures. Please bear in mind that definitions and estimation methods vary for some countries. For details see: Data source(s): OECD Annual Quality Assurance (AQA) questionnaire. Contact: ENV.Stat@oecd.org Dataset release date: March, 2026 Definitions Country metadata