Chile vs Sweden: Intensity of use of forest resources — Gross Increment

Chile
113,613 Cubic metres
in 2023
Sweden
103,035 Cubic metres
in 2020
Chile rank
2nd
Sweden rank
4th

Intensity of use of forest resources — Gross Increment over time

  • Chile
  • Sweden
25.0k50.0k75.0k100.0k125.0k195019862023

How they compare

Chile currently reports 113,613 Cubic metres against 103,035 Cubic metres in Sweden, a difference of 10,578 Cubic metres.

That makes Chile's figure about 1.1 times Sweden's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 1950 it was Sweden ahead.

Chile ranks 2nd and Sweden ranks 4th of 23 countries.

Across the 5 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 1 and Sweden in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chile Sweden Difference Ahead
1950s 20,659 Cubic metres 65,000 Cubic metres 44,341 Cubic metres Sweden
1990s 76,707 Cubic metres 94,060 Cubic metres 17,354 Cubic metres Sweden
2000s 82,994 Cubic metres 95,234 Cubic metres 12,240 Cubic metres Sweden
2010s 96,582 Cubic metres 104,097 Cubic metres 7,515 Cubic metres Sweden
2020s 120,547 Cubic metres 103,035 Cubic metres 17,512 Cubic metres Chile

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher intensity of use of forest resources — gross increment, Chile or Sweden?
Chile, at 113,613 Cubic metres against 103,035 Cubic metres in Sweden as of 2023.
What is the difference in intensity of use of forest resources — gross increment between Chile and Sweden?
10,578 Cubic metres, with Chile ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Sweden?
6 years are reported by both, from 1950 to 2020.
How do Chile and Sweden rank globally for intensity of use of forest resources — gross increment?
Chile ranks 2nd and Sweden ranks 4th of 23 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Intensity of use of forest resources — Gross Increment. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chile vs Sweden: Intensity of use of forest resources — Gross Increment. Statizoid, drawing on Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Retrieved 28 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/intensity-of-use-of-forest-resources-gross-increment/chile/sweden/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/intensity-of-use-of-forest-resources-gross-increment/chile/sweden/">Chile vs Sweden: Intensity of use of forest resources — Gross Increment</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Intensity of use of forest resources — Gross Increment
Unit
Cubic metres
Source
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
Licence
OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
32 places, 670 data points, 1950–2024
Last refreshed

This dataset traces net changes in terms of volume in the growing stock of standing wood on forest land. Forest depletion and growth describe balances or imbalances in different types of forests. The intensity of use of forest resources reflects various forest management methods and their sustainability. These data should be read in connection with other indicators, in particular land use changes and forest quality (species diversity, forest degradation), and be complemented with data on forest management practices and protection measures. Please bear in mind that definitions and estimation methods vary for some countries. For details see: Data source(s): OECD Annual Quality Assurance (AQA) questionnaire. Contact: ENV.Stat@oecd.org Dataset release date: March, 2026 Definitions Country metadata