Croatia vs Finland: Intensity of use of forest resources — Gross Increment
Intensity of use of forest resources — Gross Increment over time
- Croatia
- Finland
How they compare
Finland currently reports 96,915 Cubic metres against 9,681 Cubic metres in Croatia, a difference of 87,234 Cubic metres.
That makes Finland's figure about 10.0 times Croatia's.
Across all 35 years both countries report, Finland has been ahead every year.
Croatia ranks 3rd and Finland ranks 5th of 3 countries.
Finland has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Croatia | Finland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 8,986 Cubic metres | 83,395 Cubic metres | 74,409 Cubic metres | Finland |
| 2000s | 9,524 Cubic metres | 96,930 Cubic metres | 87,406 Cubic metres | Finland |
| 2010s | 9,509 Cubic metres | 100,492 Cubic metres | 90,983 Cubic metres | Finland |
| 2020s | 9,653 Cubic metres | 96,915 Cubic metres | 87,262 Cubic metres | Finland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher intensity of use of forest resources — gross increment, Croatia or Finland?
- Finland, at 96,915 Cubic metres against 9,681 Cubic metres in Croatia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in intensity of use of forest resources — gross increment between Croatia and Finland?
- 87,234 Cubic metres, with Finland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Croatia and Finland?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Croatia and Finland rank globally for intensity of use of forest resources — gross increment?
- Croatia ranks 3rd and Finland ranks 5th of 3 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Intensity of use of forest resources — Gross Increment. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
This dataset traces net changes in terms of volume in the growing stock of standing wood on forest land. Forest depletion and growth describe balances or imbalances in different types of forests. The intensity of use of forest resources reflects various forest management methods and their sustainability. These data should be read in connection with other indicators, in particular land use changes and forest quality (species diversity, forest degradation), and be complemented with data on forest management practices and protection measures. Please bear in mind that definitions and estimation methods vary for some countries. For details see: Data source(s): OECD Annual Quality Assurance (AQA) questionnaire. Contact: ENV.Stat@oecd.org Dataset release date: March, 2026 Definitions Country metadata