Denmark vs Luxembourg: Intensity of use of forest resources — Gross Increment
Intensity of use of forest resources — Gross Increment over time
- Denmark
- Luxembourg
How they compare
Denmark currently reports 6,734 Cubic metres against 758 Cubic metres in Luxembourg, a difference of 5,976 Cubic metres.
That makes Denmark's figure about 8.9 times Luxembourg's.
Across all 12 years both countries report, Denmark has been ahead every year.
Denmark ranks 19th and Luxembourg ranks 22nd of 23 countries.
Denmark has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Denmark | Luxembourg | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 4,887 Cubic metres | 661 Cubic metres | 4,226 Cubic metres | Denmark |
| 2010s | 6,780 Cubic metres | 755.62 Cubic metres | 6,025 Cubic metres | Denmark |
| 2020s | 6,298 Cubic metres | 758 Cubic metres | 5,540 Cubic metres | Denmark |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher intensity of use of forest resources — gross increment, Denmark or Luxembourg?
- Denmark, at 6,734 Cubic metres against 758 Cubic metres in Luxembourg as of 2022.
- What is the difference in intensity of use of forest resources — gross increment between Denmark and Luxembourg?
- 5,976 Cubic metres, with Denmark ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Denmark and Luxembourg?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2022.
- How do Denmark and Luxembourg rank globally for intensity of use of forest resources — gross increment?
- Denmark ranks 19th and Luxembourg ranks 22nd of 23 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Intensity of use of forest resources — Gross Increment. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
This dataset traces net changes in terms of volume in the growing stock of standing wood on forest land. Forest depletion and growth describe balances or imbalances in different types of forests. The intensity of use of forest resources reflects various forest management methods and their sustainability. These data should be read in connection with other indicators, in particular land use changes and forest quality (species diversity, forest degradation), and be complemented with data on forest management practices and protection measures. Please bear in mind that definitions and estimation methods vary for some countries. For details see: Data source(s): OECD Annual Quality Assurance (AQA) questionnaire. Contact: ENV.Stat@oecd.org Dataset release date: March, 2026 Definitions Country metadata