Estonia vs Japan: Intensity of use of forest resources — Gross Increment
Intensity of use of forest resources — Gross Increment over time
- Estonia
- Japan
How they compare
Japan currently reports 87,143 Cubic metres against 12,423 Cubic metres in Estonia, a difference of 74,720 Cubic metres.
That makes Japan's figure about 7.0 times Estonia's.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Japan has been ahead every year.
Estonia ranks 4th and Japan ranks 7th of 6 countries.
Japan has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Estonia | Japan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 8,273 Cubic metres | 38,400 Cubic metres | 30,127 Cubic metres | Japan |
| 1980s | 8,893 Cubic metres | 59,600 Cubic metres | 50,707 Cubic metres | Japan |
| 1990s | 9,178 Cubic metres | 72,084 Cubic metres | 62,906 Cubic metres | Japan |
| 2000s | 12,924 Cubic metres | 86,072 Cubic metres | 73,148 Cubic metres | Japan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher intensity of use of forest resources — gross increment, Estonia or Japan?
- Japan, at 87,143 Cubic metres against 12,423 Cubic metres in Estonia as of 2005.
- What is the difference in intensity of use of forest resources — gross increment between Estonia and Japan?
- 74,720 Cubic metres, with Japan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Estonia and Japan?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2005.
- How do Estonia and Japan rank globally for intensity of use of forest resources — gross increment?
- Estonia ranks 4th and Japan ranks 7th of 6 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Intensity of use of forest resources — Gross Increment. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
This dataset traces net changes in terms of volume in the growing stock of standing wood on forest land. Forest depletion and growth describe balances or imbalances in different types of forests. The intensity of use of forest resources reflects various forest management methods and their sustainability. These data should be read in connection with other indicators, in particular land use changes and forest quality (species diversity, forest degradation), and be complemented with data on forest management practices and protection measures. Please bear in mind that definitions and estimation methods vary for some countries. For details see: Data source(s): OECD Annual Quality Assurance (AQA) questionnaire. Contact: ENV.Stat@oecd.org Dataset release date: March, 2026 Definitions Country metadata