Estonia vs United States of America: Intensity of use of forest resources — Gross Increment

Estonia
12,423 Cubic metres
in 2024
United States of America
1.07 million Cubic metres
in 2022
Estonia rank
4th
United States of America rank
1st

Intensity of use of forest resources — Gross Increment over time

  • Estonia
  • United States of America
0250.0k500.0k750.0k1.0M1.2M195019872024

How they compare

United States of America currently reports 1.07 million Cubic metres against 12,423 Cubic metres in Estonia, a difference of 1.06 million Cubic metres.

That makes United States of America's figure about 86.3 times Estonia's.

Across all 7 years both countries report, United States of America has been ahead every year.

Estonia ranks 4th and United States of America ranks 1st of 6 countries.

United States of America has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Estonia United States of America Difference Ahead
1950s 7,065 Cubic metres 560,195 Cubic metres 553,130 Cubic metres United States of America
1970s 8,273 Cubic metres 769,524 Cubic metres 761,251 Cubic metres United States of America
2000s 12,992 Cubic metres 1.03 million Cubic metres 1.02 million Cubic metres United States of America
2010s 13,799 Cubic metres 1.07 million Cubic metres 1.06 million Cubic metres United States of America
2020s 12,808 Cubic metres 1.07 million Cubic metres 1.06 million Cubic metres United States of America

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher intensity of use of forest resources — gross increment, Estonia or United States of America?
United States of America, at 1.07 million Cubic metres against 12,423 Cubic metres in Estonia as of 2022.
What is the difference in intensity of use of forest resources — gross increment between Estonia and United States of America?
1.06 million Cubic metres, with United States of America ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Estonia and United States of America?
7 years are reported by both, from 1950 to 2022.
How do Estonia and United States of America rank globally for intensity of use of forest resources — gross increment?
Estonia ranks 4th and United States of America ranks 1st of 6 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Intensity of use of forest resources — Gross Increment. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Estonia vs United States of America: Intensity of use of forest resources — Gross Increment. Statizoid, drawing on Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Retrieved 04 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/intensity-of-use-of-forest-resources-gross-increment/estonia-2/united-states/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/intensity-of-use-of-forest-resources-gross-increment/estonia-2/united-states/">Estonia vs United States of America: Intensity of use of forest resources — Gross Increment</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Intensity of use of forest resources — Gross Increment
Unit
Cubic metres
Source
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
Licence
OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
32 places, 670 data points, 1950–2024
Last refreshed

This dataset traces net changes in terms of volume in the growing stock of standing wood on forest land. Forest depletion and growth describe balances or imbalances in different types of forests. The intensity of use of forest resources reflects various forest management methods and their sustainability. These data should be read in connection with other indicators, in particular land use changes and forest quality (species diversity, forest degradation), and be complemented with data on forest management practices and protection measures. Please bear in mind that definitions and estimation methods vary for some countries. For details see: Data source(s): OECD Annual Quality Assurance (AQA) questionnaire. Contact: ENV.Stat@oecd.org Dataset release date: March, 2026 Definitions Country metadata